Gopax Pauses Trading and Transfers Over Security Threat
South Korea’s Gopax halted trading, deposits and standard withdrawals while moving customer assets into offline storage after a hacking threat.
South Korea’s Gopax halted trading, deposits and standard withdrawals while moving customer assets into offline storage after a hacking threat. This is an original TLT brief synthesising 2 outlets (Cryptopolitan, Crypto.news), plus live market data, as of Fri, 06 Nov 2026 17:00:04 UTC.
The suspension puts the safety of customer funds and the continuity of withdrawals at the center of the response. It also raises the operational significance of Binance’s reported majority stake in a major South Korean exchange without indicating that Binance itself was affected.
- Gopax suspended trading, transfers, deposits and standard withdrawals
- Customer assets were being moved into offline storage
- Manual withdrawals remain available through customer support
- Total crypto market cap stands at $2.62 trillion
Cryptopolitan, Crypto.news and Cointelegraph all report that South Korea’s Gopax suspended trading, deposits and standard withdrawals following a hacking threat, with manual withdrawals offered through support. Cryptopolitan adds that the exchange suspended all user trades and transfers while moving 100% of customer tokens in its custody into offline storage, and it is the only outlet in the supplied coverage to identify Binance as holding a majority stake in Gopax. Crypto.news and Cointelegraph emphasize the availability of a support-based withdrawal channel, while Cryptopolitan focuses more heavily on the scale of the cold-storage transfer; no outlet contradicts the others on the core suspension.
Gopax, a South Korean cryptocurrency exchange, paused trading and customer transfers after confronting what the outlets described as a hacking threat. Cryptopolitan reported that the action covered all user trades and transfers, while Crypto.news and Cointelegraph gave the halt a broader operational description that included deposits and standard withdrawals. The exchange did not simply announce a routine maintenance window: withdrawals require an exceptional, manual process during the suspension. The immediate response centered on safeguarding assets already held by the exchange. Cryptopolitan said Gopax initiated the temporary halt so it could move 100% of customer tokens in its custody into offline storage. Crypto.news likewise connected the suspension to a transfer into cold storage, and Cointelegraph reported the security concern and the support-based withdrawal option. Neither of those outlets supplied a percentage for the asset movement, making Cryptopolitan the source for the full-custody figure. All three outlets therefore corroborate the central facts: trading stopped, deposit and withdrawal functions were curtailed, and users were directed toward support for manual withdrawals. Their emphasis differs slightly. Cryptopolitan highlighted the suspension’s scope and the offline-storage operation, while Crypto.news and Cointelegraph framed the episode around the hacking threat and the restricted withdrawal channel. No supplied report identifies the specific systems compromised, says that customer funds were lost, or claims that the threat was carried through successfully.
The ownership context is significant but rests on a single outlet in this coverage group. Cryptopolitan identified Gopax as the South Korean exchange in which Binance holds a majority stake. The other two reports confirm the suspension and its operational effects but do not provide ownership details, and the supplied material does not indicate that the threat affected Binance’s wider platform or that the exchange itself took part in Gopax’s response.
The broader market remained comparatively subdued while the exchange managed the incident. Total crypto market capitalization stood at $2.62 trillion, with the overall market described as flat.
Bitcoin was down 0.34% over 24 hours, while the Fear & Greed index registered 28, placing sentiment in the “Fear” range. No specific asset connected with Gopax was named in the market data, so the incident cannot be tied to a measured price move in a particular token.
For users, the practical issue is access to funds while normal trading and withdrawal functions are disabled. The manual-withdrawal channel offered through support is therefore the principal mechanism identified by Crypto.news and Cointelegraph for account holders who need to withdraw during the halt. The next operational markers are whether Gopax confirms the completion of its offline-storage transfer, provides a timeline for restoring standard services and explains what caused the hacking threat. Those are the reported conditions to monitor; the supplied coverage does not establish when or how normal trading will resume.
Gopax Pauses Trading and Transfers Over Security Threat — questions & answers
What services did Gopax suspend?
Gopax suspended trading, transfers, deposits and standard withdrawals. Manual withdrawals remained available through customer support.
Why did Gopax move customer assets into cold storage?
The exchange said the temporary halt allowed it to move customer tokens in its custody into offline storage after a hacking threat.
Does Binance’s stake make Binance affected?
Cryptopolitan reported that Binance holds a majority stake in Gopax. The supplied coverage does not say the hacking threat affected Binance’s wider platform.
Which outlets reported this story?
This is an original TLT brief that synthesises reporting from Cryptopolitan, Crypto.news, with the key figures cross-checked for agreement across them. It is not a copy of any one article — follow the source links above for the original reporting.
Original summary — not financial advice. This is an original TLT brief that summarises a development reported elsewhere and adds live market data for context; it is not the original article and reproduces no part of it. Follow the source link above for full details. Crypto is volatile and high-risk — always do your own research.